Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jordan Thompson vs Brandon Nakashima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Thompson vs Nakashima analysis and find out who is favored!
Jordan Thompson vs Brandon Nakashima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Thompson 2 - 3 Nakashima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thompson has won 54.24% of points on their second serve, while Nakashima has won 55.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thompson, in recent form, has won 46.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nakashima has won 48.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.55% and 29.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Thompson has saved 70.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakashima has saved 68.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Thompson has won 52.54% of matches played (W/L 31/ 28), with Nakashima winning 63.22% (W/L 55/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Thompson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 38/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 86/ 64). Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 29/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Thompson has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 25/ 15), where as Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75.56% of matches (W/L 34/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Thompson winning 2 times and Nakashima being victorious 3 times. They have played 15 sets in total, with Thompson winning 7 and Nakashima winning 8. The last match between Thompson and Nakashima was at the Wimbledon - London, 03-07-2023, First, Grass with Jordan Thompson getting the victory 2-6 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:30:31.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Thompson and Nakashima have played a deciding set 3 times, with Thompson winning 1 times and Nakashima 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 5 tiebreaks against each other with Thompson winning 2, and Nakashima 3.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thompson has played against opponents with an average rank of 147.53 while Nakashima has played against players with an average rank of 244.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thompson has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakashima has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Thompson has converted 34.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakashima has converted 33.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
39
Rank
32
High
30
Age
R
Plays
2
Total3
0
Hard3
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
1
Grass0
64
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
60% (447-299)
Career Total W/L
62% (199-124)
56% (19-15)
YTD W/L
69% (41-18)
$2,991,515
Career Prize Money
$1,830,310
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jordan Thompson vs Brandon Nakashima For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Thompson VS Nakashima
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Jordan Thompson | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 7 | 8 |
| Games Won | 78 | 83 |
| Aces (Total) | 71 | 32 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:30:31 | 2:30:31 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (300/493) | 64% (309/483) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (233/300) | 75% (231/309) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (101/193) | 58% (101/174) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (9/31) | 31% (11/36) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (151/483) | 32% (159/493) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Jordan Thompson
Player
Brandon Nakashima
62%
(
85 of
137)
1st Serve %
62%
(
88 of
141)
16
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
65 of
88)
62%
(
32 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
34%
(
46 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
46 of
141)
137
Total Points Won
141
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jordan Thompson
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
9
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
20 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 7-5 7-6(1) |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
13
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jordan Thompson
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| 6-3 4-6 7-6(4) |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jordan Thompson
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
4
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
34%
(
36 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jordan Thompson | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (19/15) | 69% (41/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (44/40) | 64% (88/50) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (406/412) | 54% (754/650) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 73% (11/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 65% (13/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 73% (11/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 67% (6/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.68 |
| Aces Total | 193 | 465 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:50 | 1:51:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 140.41 | 271.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1574/2612) | 65% (2884/4418) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1112/1574) | 75% (2155/2884) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (563/1038) | 56% (856/1534) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (76/220) | 34% (127/374) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (941/2618) | 36% (1663/4568) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/4) | 64% (7/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (18/9) | 64% (7/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 76% (26/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (17/30) | 69% (38/55) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 79% (11/14) | 62% (21/34) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 63% (12/19) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 89% (37/33) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 11% (37/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 29% (21/6) |
Jordan Thompson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Jordan Thompson
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Taylor Fritz
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Andy Murray
50%
(
5 of
10)
1st Serve %
56%
(
9 of
16)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
18
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Holger Rune
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
8
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
18 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Jordan Thompson
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
14
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
56%
(
60 of
107)
1st Serve %
82%
(
86 of
105)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
86)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
37 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Brandon Nakashima
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
13
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
94%
(
31 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Richard Gasquet
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
7
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
18 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Brandon Nakashima
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
75%
(
58 of
77)
12
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
12 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Zachary Svajda
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
12
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Joao Fonseca
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mattia Bellucci
68%
(
84 of
124)
1st Serve %
58%
(
80 of
138)
17
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
11
75%
(
63 of
84)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
64 of
80)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
35 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
47 of
138)
136
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(4) 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Thompson Vs Nakashima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Thompson are available here and Nakashima photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
